![]() ![]() ![]() In the 21st century, we are witnessing another important shift in both power and knowledge due to factors that include the increased public platforms afforded by social media. Foucault argued that these institutions work to maintain their claims to legitimacy by controlling knowledge. According to Foucault, there is therefore an intimate and interlinked relationship between power and knowledge.Īt the time Foucault was writing on the topic, the control of power and knowledge had moved away from religious institutions, who previously held a very singular hold over knowledge and morality, and was instead beginning to move towards a network of scientific institutions, media monopolies, legal courts, and bureaucratized governments. At the same time, those in power control what is considered to be correct and incorrect knowledge. He suggested that knowledge is created and used in a way that reinforces the claims to legitimacy of those in power. He is well known, amongst many other things, for looking at the close relationship between power and knowledge. This viewpoint is somewhat typified by the work of Michel Foucault, a famous and heavily influential 20th century philosopher who made a career of studying those on the fringes of society to understand what they could tell us about everyday life. The level of discussion however often did not revolve around the models on offer, but on broader issues of attitudes towards existing structures of knowledge, and the institutions that supported and presented these models.įlat earthers are not the first group to be skeptical of existing power structures and their tight grasps on knowledge. Multiple competing models were suggested throughout the weekend, including "classic" flat earth, domes, ice walls, diamonds, puddles with multiple worlds inside, and even the earth as the inside of a giant cosmic egg. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |